The EA had initially determined that on-site treatment would require a permit, but it has now confirmed that, so long as operators comply with the requirements of its newly-issued Regulatory Position Statement, then no permit will be needed.
FEA chair John Whitehouse said he welcomed the pragmatic response from the EA.
“We support the use of AD (anaerobic digestion) but do not believe it can, or does, provide a universal ‘best’ solution for all end of life food waste producers in the foodservice market.
“AD should be complemented by other on-site alternatives which, as a result of the Food Waste Product Group’s campaign, do not now require the operator to have a permit from the EA.
“Waste producers must be able to apply ‘TEEP’ (technical, economic, environmental and practical) principles to determine the best route available to them for their food waste.
“This principle is an element of our representation in the consultation regarding the Environment Bill, currently going through the committee stage in Government.”
He said the EA change of heart had been achieved by the FEA Food Waste Product Group, which had ‘presented a strong and well thought-out case, engaging with both the EA and DEFRA’.
“The EA had identified a gap in policy enforcement and wanted there to be a requirement that operators applied and paid for permits to treat food waste on-site.
“Many equipment manufacturers were sent letters last October requesting performance characteristics of their food waste management systems.
“Our own Food Waste Product Group worked with these manufacturers to present a collective position. This gave figures relating to market penetration of food waste management systems and the estimated waste volumes being treated.
“It also underlined the issues that operators face in managing their food waste.
“Virtually everyone agrees that the collection of food waste for anaerobic digestion is a good policy. The FEA supports it, too, but its campaign highlighted that there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution, and that the various alternative technologies available can provide a greener solution, depending on the site’s circumstances.”
He added that, in the light of the Covid-19 pandemic, hygiene and safety had become even more important than before.
“What if kerbside collection services are disrupted or cancelled? In such cases, there would be clear hygiene hazards and foodservice operators would have no choice but to send food waste to landfill.
“This is not in keeping with the overriding desires and principles of the Government Waste Strategy.”
The FEA also pointed out that up to 20% of food waste collected for AD goes to landfill, due to contamination, while alternative on-site systems of food waste management can contribute significantly towards the zero-landfill targets.
Examples of these alternative systems, included dewaterers, digesters, sink to sewer disposal, in vessel composters and grease traps, grease removal units and bacterial dosers.
The new regulatory position statement, which is due for review in December 2021, can be viewed at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/treating-food-waste-where-the-food-was-served-and-consumed-rps-229